Ks. Meyer et al., NOSOCOMIAL OUTBREAK OF KLEBSIELLA INFECTION RESISTANT TO LATE-GENERATION CEPHALOSPORINS, Annals of internal medicine, 119(5), 1993, pp. 353-358
Objective: To describe the epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibility,
and control of widespread ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
infections in a North American hospital and circumstances that led to
delayed detection. Design: A 2-year epidemiologic, microbiologic, and
clinical cohort study. Setting: A 487-bed general hospital in New Yor
k City. Patients and Clinical Isolates: Patient records were reviewed
retrospectively and prospectively. Isolates were obtained from the Cli
nical Microbiology Laboratory. Results: Four hundred thirty-two isolat
es of ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae were recovered durin
g a 19-month study period. The peak incidence reached 17.3% of all Kle
bsiella isolates. One hundred fifty-five patients were colonized or in
fected, representing more than 70 per 1000 average daily census. Infec
tions occurred in 39% of patients from whom ceftazidime-resistant Kleb
siella was isolated. These included 14 bacteremias and 17 pulmonary in
fections among 52 infected patients. The outbreak coincided with incre
asing use of ceftazidime therapy for multiresistant Acinetobacter infe
ctions. Reduction in ceftazidime use and barrier precautions markedly
reduced the incidence of colonization and infection. Ceftriaxone, ceft
izoxime, cefotaxime, and cephamycins were inhibitory, but not bacteric
idal, against ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella and appeared effective
by routine disc diffusion tests. In contrast, imipenem provided consis
tent bactericidal activity. Preliminary studies indicated that the out
break was caused by one or more plasmid-mediated beta lactamases. Conc
lusions. Nosocomial ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae may be
resistant to the bactericidal activity of all cephalosporins and ceph
amycins. Such isolates appear susceptible to cephalosporins other than
ceftazidime by routine disc diffusion testing. Ineffective therapy, d
elayed detection of resistance, and epidemic spread are potential cons
equences. Imipenem provides consistent bactericidal activity. Ceftazid
ime restriction and barrier precautions for colonized and infected pat
ients are effective control measures.