Although consumer researchers often assume that survey responses refle
ct true beliefs, attitudes, and intentions, most recent research in so
cial judgment and behavioral decision making suggests that people ofte
n construct answers to survey questions on the basis of their response
s to earlier items. A framework proposed by Feldman and Lynch suggests
that answers are most likely to be constructed when the respondent do
es not have other, more diagnostic inputs accessible in memory. Two fi
eld experiments conducted during the 1988 and 1992 presidential electi
ons support this model. In experiment 1, when a respondent had voted f
or one of the candidates in the primary, voting intention was not base
d on earlier survey answers; when a respondent had not voted for these
candidates in the primary, voting intention appeared to be constructe
d. Regardless of primary voting behavior, all respondents appeared to
construct issue opinions. The effect of earlier answers on issue opini
ons decreased as the election neared, consistent with the idea that kn
owledge about the issues increased with time. In experiment 2, placing
questions tapping primary voting behavior first affected responses to
questions about specific issue opinions, with resulting carryover to
a later measure of voting intention. We discuss the implications of th
ese results for consumer judgment processes and for measurement of con
sumers' attitudes and intentions.