The case in which a group of decision makers appoints a committee to c
hoose between two symmetrical alternatives by a simple majority vote,
namely restricted majority decision rule, is one member of the set of
weighted majority decision rules. It is shown that for any group of de
cision makers one of the restricted majority decision rules is always
the worst of all weighted majority decision rules. This inferiority ex
ists both in terms of the efficiency and in terms of effectiveness of
the decision rule. The importance of this finding should be kept in mi
nd when deciding the size of the committee because a seemingly irrelev
ant change in the number of decision makers may result in the inferior
rule, instead of the optimal rule, being used. Moreover, because of t
he widespread use of restricted majority decision rules and the relati
vely small number of such rules, the probability of the inferior rule
being used is relatively high.