P. Grof et al., THE CHALLENGE OF PREDICTING RESPONSE TO STABILIZING LITHIUM TREATMENT- THE IMPORTANCE OF PATIENT SELECTION, British Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1993, pp. 16-19
Lithium treatment, an approach with well documented efficacy, has rece
ntly been losing its treatment value. Lithium continues working, howev
er, for those patients for whom it was proven efficacious; that is, mo
st patients with primary episodic affective disorders. Such responders
to lithium prophylaxis can be reliably identified beforehand by a com
prehensive clinical assessment. The explanation for the paradox of lit
hium's lost efficacy lies mostly in the educational bias against a com
prehensive patient assessment, and in the shift in diagnostic fashion
favouring affective disorders and the treatment methods associated wit
h them in the clinicians' minds.