Objective: To assess prospectively the utility of intrapartum Mueller-
Hillis maneuvers in predicting labor abnormalities. Methods: Patients
underwent Mueller-Hillis maneuvers upon admission in active labor. Out
comes of each labor were assessed, and correlations were sought betwee
n the degree of descent and outcome. Labor curves were constructed for
each patient, and labor abnormalities were described by an observer b
linded to descent and outcome. The relationship of labor abnormality t
o outcome also was evaluated. Results: One hundred six patients had Mu
eller-Hillis maneuvers performed. The distribution of results was as f
ollows: no descent (N = 25) 23.6%, one station (N = 33) 31.1%, two sta
tions (N = 46) 43.4%, and three stations (N = 2) 1.9%. Lack of descent
failed to indicate increased risk of abdominal delivery, operative va
ginal delivery, need for oxytocin augmentation, prolonged second stage
, or labor curve abnormality. Analysis of parity (nulliparous versus m
ultiparous) did not alter these findings. Conclusion: We present norma
tive data for the results of Mueller-Hillis maneuvers performed in act
ive labor. To our knowledge, no such data exist. We also failed to fin
d a relationship between dystocia and descent with the maneuver. Until
this test is demonstrated to be useful, it should not be used to pred
ict dystocia.