Jm. Cannon et Jg. Blythe, COMPARISON OF THE CYTOBRUSH PLUS PLASTIC SPATULA WITH THE CERVEX BRUSH FOR OBTAINING ENDOCERVICAL CELLS, Obstetrics and gynecology, 82(4), 1993, pp. 569-572
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the Cytobrush plus plastic
spatula with that of the Cervex Brush for obtaining acceptable yields
of endocervical cells in Papanicolaou smears. Methods: We collected 30
9 smears over a 6-month period, 132 with the Cytobrush plus spatula an
d 177 with the Cervex Brush. About one-third of the patients in each g
roup were pregnant. Numbers of endocervical cells in the smears were d
escribed as none, few, moderate, or many. Results: Moderate or large n
umbers of endocervical cells were collected from 60.5% of the women in
the Cervex Brush group and 65.2% of those in the Cytobrush-spatula gr
oup. The percentages were not statistically different. Conclusion: The
Cytobrush plus spatula and the Cervex Brush sampling methods were equ
ally effective in obtaining endocervical cells in routine Papanicolaou
smears.