COMPARISON OF THE CYTOBRUSH PLUS PLASTIC SPATULA WITH THE CERVEX BRUSH FOR OBTAINING ENDOCERVICAL CELLS

Citation
Jm. Cannon et Jg. Blythe, COMPARISON OF THE CYTOBRUSH PLUS PLASTIC SPATULA WITH THE CERVEX BRUSH FOR OBTAINING ENDOCERVICAL CELLS, Obstetrics and gynecology, 82(4), 1993, pp. 569-572
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00297844
Volume
82
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Part
1
Pages
569 - 572
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(1993)82:4<569:COTCPP>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with that of the Cervex Brush for obtaining acceptable yields of endocervical cells in Papanicolaou smears. Methods: We collected 30 9 smears over a 6-month period, 132 with the Cytobrush plus spatula an d 177 with the Cervex Brush. About one-third of the patients in each g roup were pregnant. Numbers of endocervical cells in the smears were d escribed as none, few, moderate, or many. Results: Moderate or large n umbers of endocervical cells were collected from 60.5% of the women in the Cervex Brush group and 65.2% of those in the Cytobrush-spatula gr oup. The percentages were not statistically different. Conclusion: The Cytobrush plus spatula and the Cervex Brush sampling methods were equ ally effective in obtaining endocervical cells in routine Papanicolaou smears.