This article models the electoral process as a game of incomplete info
rmation in which voters choose between candidates on the basis of the
likelihood that each will fulfill the campaign promises made. The elec
torate's uncertainty about the future behavior of its representatives
means that some candidates will win seats even though they are not com
mitted to performing as promised. Moreover because such candidates hav
e more actions available to them than do their honest counterparts, th
ey enjoy an electoral advantage until voters have acquired full inform
ation about them. This advantage makes a political career more attract
ive to dishonest individuals than to honest members of the same occupa
tional class, so that dishonest people will tend disproportionately to
enter politics.