This response to a recent article in ST&HV by Woolgar (''The Turn to T
echnology in Social Studies of Science'') investigates Woolgar's conce
pt of analytic ambivalence. The response points out how this notion or
iginates in a formula applied to social problems research and how this
formula is used as the basis for Woolgar's critique of work in the so
cial studies of technology. The response then goes on to show that Woo
lgar's own application of the formula of analytic ambivalence is formu
laic and glosses over many of the interesting features of the social s
tudies of technology. Woolgar's article seems set to become another ex
emplification of the reflexivist formula rather than an occasion for q
uestioning the idea of applying formulas altogether