THE EVOLUTION OF NONHUMAN PRIMATE VOCALIZATIONS - EFFECTS OF PHYLOGENY, BODY-WEIGHT, AND SOCIAL-CONTEXT

Authors
Citation
Md. Hauser, THE EVOLUTION OF NONHUMAN PRIMATE VOCALIZATIONS - EFFECTS OF PHYLOGENY, BODY-WEIGHT, AND SOCIAL-CONTEXT, The American naturalist, 142(3), 1993, pp. 528-542
Citations number
68
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00030147
Volume
142
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
528 - 542
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-0147(1993)142:3<528:TEONPV>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
E. S. Morton proposed that, in birds and mammals, individuals tend to produce low-frequency atonal vocalizations in highly aggressive situat ions, whereas they typically produce high-frequency tonal vocalization s during nonaggressive or fearful situations. This hypothesis, referre d to as the ''motivation-structural (MS) rules,'' is based on two assu mptions: the frequency of a vocalization is negatively correlated with body weight, and large animals are dominant over smaller animals, and thus aggressive vocalizations tend to have a lower pitch than fearful vocalizations. The relationship between body weight and frequency is examined using data on 36 nonhuman primate species representing 23 gen era and 474 vocalizations. Results show that there is a statistically significant negative correlation between body weight and frequency. la rger species produce relatively lower-pitched vocalizations than small er species. A test of Morton's MS rules provided overall support for t he predicted relationship between motivational state and frequency (i. e., high-frequency calls were produced by fearful individuals, and low -frequency calls were produced by aggressive individuals) but no suppo rt for the expected relationship between motivational state and tonali ty. However, the motivational state-frequency pairing was confounded b y the fact that some taxonomic groups (Platyrrhini and Catarrhini) sho wed a much stronger level of association than other groups (Prosimii a nd Hominoidea). In summary, therefore, the nonhuman primate data provi de only partial support for MS rules. At least three factors may have influenced the outcome of the current test. First, in some species, mo tivational state may be more closely associated with other acoustic pa rameters than absolute frequency and tonality. Second, the acoustic st ructure of nonhuman primate vocalizations is, at least in some cases, more closely associated with an external referent than with the caller 's internal state. And third, features of the species-typical habitat have had direct selective effects on signal structure, optimizing for effective propagation through the environment.