PARTIAL HYDATIDIFORM MOLE - A COMMON BUT UNDERDIAGNOSED CONDITION - A3-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL AND DNA FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Citation
Md. Jeffers et al., PARTIAL HYDATIDIFORM MOLE - A COMMON BUT UNDERDIAGNOSED CONDITION - A3-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL AND DNA FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS, International journal of gynecological pathology, 12(4), 1993, pp. 315-323
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology",Pathology
ISSN journal
02771691
Volume
12
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
315 - 323
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-1691(1993)12:4<315:PHM-AC>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
This retrospective study reports the incidence of hydatidiform mole in a population of 19,457 pregnancies over a 3-year period. During the s tudy period all ''products of conception'' from first and second trime ster abortions were referred for pathological examination. Coded histo logic sections were reviewed using the published histologic criteria f or hydatidiform mole. Ploidy was estimated by DNA flow cytometry. Clin ical data were retrieved from maternal case notes. Thirty-eight cases were confirmed as hydatidiform mole, 10 (26%) as complete mole, and 28 (74%) as partial mole. Twenty-three cases of partial mole (88%) were triploid, and nine of 10 complete moles were diploid. The incidence of hydatidiform mole was 1:512 pregnancies, (complete mole, 1:1,945; par tial mole, 1:695). Only one case (3.5%) of partial mole was suspected clinically. One case of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease o ccurred following a complete mole. No sequelae were encountered follow ing partial mole. We conclude that hydatidiform mole is a common condi tion and the majority of cases are partial moles. Quantitatively impre cise morphologic criteria contribute to the inaccuracy in reporting of partial mole; analysis of ploidy is useful in the evaluation of. prob lem cases. Follow-up of partial mole is warranted because its true bio logical potential is as yet unclear.