A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF DIETARY-FAT AND RISK OF PROSTATE-CANCER

Citation
E. Giovannucci et al., A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF DIETARY-FAT AND RISK OF PROSTATE-CANCER, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(19), 1993, pp. 1571-1579
Citations number
77
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Volume
85
Issue
19
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1571 - 1579
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Background: The strong correlation between national consumption of fat and national rate of mortality from prostate cancer has raised the hy pothesis that dietary fat increases the risk of this malignancy. Case- control and cohort studies have not consistently supported this hypoth esis. Purpose: We examined prospectively the relationship between pros tate cancer and dietary fat, including specific fatty acids and dietar y sources of fat. We examined the relationship of fat consumption to t he incidence of advanced prostate cancer (stages C, D, or fatal cases) and to the total incidence of prostate cancer. Methods: We used data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, which is a prospective cohort of 51529 U.S. men, aged 40 through 75, who completed a validate d food-frequency questionnaire in 1986. We sent follow-up questionnair es to the entire cohort in 1988 and 1990 to document new cases of a va riety of diseases and to update exposure information. As of January 31 , 1990, 300 new cases of prostate cancer, including 126 advanced cases , were documented in 47855 participants initially free of diagnosed ca ncer. The Mantel-Haenszel summary estimator was used to adjust for age and other potentially confounding variables. Multiple logistic regres sion was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) when controlling simult aneously for more than two covariates. Results: Total fat consumption was directly related to risk of advanced prostate cancer (age- and ene rgy-adjusted RR = 1.79, with 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-3.07, for high versus low quintile of intake; P [trend] = .06). This associ ation was due primarily to animal fat (RR = 1.63; 95% CI = 0.95-2.78; P [trend] = .08), but not vegetable fat. Red meat represented the food group with the strongest positive association with advanced cancer (R R = 2.64; 95% CI = 1.21-5.77; P = .02). Fat from dairy products (with the exception of butter) or fish was unrelated to risk. Saturated fat, monounsaturated fat, and alpha-linolenic acid, but not linoleic acid, were associated with advanced prostate cancer risk; only the associat ion with alpha-linolenic acid persisted when saturated fat, monounsatu rated fat, linoleic acid, and alpha-linolenic acid were modeled simult aneously (multivariate RR = 3.43; 95% CI = 1.67-7.04; P [trend] = .002 ). Conclusion: The results support the hypothesis that animal fat, esp ecially fat from red meat, is associated with an elevated risk of adva nced prostate cancer. Implications: These findings support recommendat ions to lower intake of meat to reduce the risk of prostate cancer. Th e potential roles of carcinogens formed in cooking animal fat and of a lpha-linolenic acid in the progression of prostate cancer need to be e xplored.