EFFECTS OF SUNSCREENS AND A DNA EXCISION-REPAIR ENZYME ON ULTRAVIOLETRADIATION-INDUCED INFLAMMATION, IMMUNE SUPPRESSION, AND CYCLOBUTANE PYRIMIDINE DIMER FORMATION IN MICE
P. Wolf et al., EFFECTS OF SUNSCREENS AND A DNA EXCISION-REPAIR ENZYME ON ULTRAVIOLETRADIATION-INDUCED INFLAMMATION, IMMUNE SUPPRESSION, AND CYCLOBUTANE PYRIMIDINE DIMER FORMATION IN MICE, Journal of investigative dermatology, 101(4), 1993, pp. 523-527
Exposure of skin to ultraviolet (UV) radiation inhibits the induction
of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses initiated at a distan
t, unirradiated site. Recent studies attributed this form of immune su
ppression to DNA damage in the form of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (
CPD). In the present study, we investigated the protective defects of
sunscreens on UV-induced systemic suppression of DTH to Candida albica
ns, inflammation, and DNA damage. The photoprotective effects of sunsc
reen preparations containing 8% octyl-N-dimethyl-p-aminobenzoate, 7.5%
2-ethylhexyl-p-methoxycinnamate, or 6% benzophenone-3 were studied in
C3H mice exposed to a single dose of 500 mJ/cm2 UVB radiation from FS
40 sunlamps. Inflammation was determined by the amount of skin edema a
t the site of UV irradiation, and DNA damage was assessed by measuring
the frequency of endonuclease-sensitive sites in the epidermis. Appli
cation of the sunscreens before UV irradiation gave 75-97% protection
against UV-induced edema, 67-91% Protection against formation of CPD,
but only 30-54% protection against suppression of DTH. In contrast, th
e topical application of liposomes containing a CPD-specific DNA repai
r enzyme immediately after UV irradiation resulted in 82% protection a
gainst suppression of DTH, but at best, 39% protection against skin ed
ema. These findings demonstrate that sunscreens give less protection a
gainst UV-induced immune suppression than against skin edema and CPD f
ormation. Furthermore, they suggest that less DNA damage is required t
o cause UV-induced immune suppression than to cause sunburn.