The role of suspicion in the dispositional inference process is examin
ed. Perceivers who are led to become suspicious of the motives underly
ing a target's behavior appear to engage in more active and thoughtful
attributional analyses than nonsuspicious perceivers. Suspicious perc
eivers resist drawing inferences from a target's behavior that reflect
the correspondence bias (or fundamental attribution error), and they
consciously deliberate about questions of plausible causes and categor
izations of the target's behavior. They are, however, quite willing to
make strong correspondent inferences about the target if they learn a
dditional contextual information that renders alternative explanations
for the target's behavior less plausible. Implications of these findi
ngs for current multiple-stage models of the dispositional inference p
rocess are discussed, and the need for these and other models to give
more consideration to the social nature of social perception is assert
ed.