The question of how the kinship systems of the tribes of middle India
should be interpreted is examined with explicit reference to the work
of Georg Pfeffer. It is argued that his hypotheses of the existence of
four- and eight-line kinship terminologies in the region do not corre
spond to the evidence but reflect instead an excessive reliance on the
dictates of structuralist theory. These terminologies are best seen a
s modified two-line prescriptive ones, broadly intermediate between th
ose of south and north India.