OBJECTIVE: Second cervical smears obtained at short time intervals oft
en exhibit a lesser degree of abnormality than the first smear. We stu
died the effect of time interval between smears on diagnoses in two la
rge, distinctive cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with two or move sati
sfactory smears with at least one smear or a cervical biopsy showing a
typical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater were se
lected. Patients were divided into four subsets by test intervals (day
s) (less than or equal to 45, 46-90, 91-120, > 120) and compared stati
stically. RESULTS: The distribution of differences between results for
the short-interval subsets (< 120) was significantly different (P < .
01) from the interval subset > 120 days. At short intervals the result
s revealed loss of sensitivity in the second smear as compared to the
initial smear and concurrent biopsies. CONCLUSION: Rapidly repeated ce
rvical smears show poor agreement with the biopsy and may be misleadin
g. This effect is most pronounced when the interval is < 45 days. Colp
oscopists should consider whether concurrent smears shortly after an a
bnormal smear are worth performing, given the loss of sensitivity.