EFFECT OF MILK SAMPLE TREATMENT BEFORE ME ASUREMENT FOR READING OF SOMATIC-CELL NUMBER BY THE FOSSOMATIC APPARATUS

Citation
V. Gencurova et al., EFFECT OF MILK SAMPLE TREATMENT BEFORE ME ASUREMENT FOR READING OF SOMATIC-CELL NUMBER BY THE FOSSOMATIC APPARATUS, Zivocisna vyroba, 38(6), 1993, pp. 555-565
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
Journal title
ISSN journal
00444847
Volume
38
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
555 - 565
Database
ISI
SICI code
0044-4847(1993)38:6<555:EOMSTB>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
For determination of some effects on the number of registrated somatic cells (SB) in milk three tests were carried out. In the test 1 in fiv e basin milk samples the effect of time of heating the samples in bath (15 or 35 minutes) and temperature (40-degrees-C or 50-degrees-C) to which the samples were heated, in the raw and pasteurized samples for unpreserved milk (N), milk preserved by potassium bichroman (D) in the amount of 33 mg per 25 ml of milk and milk preserved by the Broad Spe ctrum Microtabs microtablets with the bronopol efficient component (B) in the amount of 10 mg per 25 ml of milk was observed. Observation la sted nine days, the temperature at storage was 4-degrees-C, the first measurement was carried out 24 hours after sampling. The samples were temperature treated before measurement for one hour under the laborato ry temperature. Each sample was heated in the bath for 15 minutes, it was measured then, put again to the bath and after 20 minutes another measurement was carried out. The results show (Fig. 1, Tab. I) that at time prolongation of heating the samples 40-degrees-C warm from 15 to 35 minutes a number of registrated cells increases for N, D and B. Un preserved samples showed in the course of two days at shorter time of heating an increase by 25 %. D and B samples with longer time of heati ng only by 5 and 6 %, that means for the samples preserved the real nu mber of cells has been determined as early as in one day after samplin g and at the heating time of 35 minutes. For the pasteurized samples b alanced results were found out for both heating times. The differencie s between raw and pasteurized milks (for N, D, B and two heating times at the temperature of 40-degrees-C) were recorded as statistically si gnificant (P < 0.05) in the first day of measurement. At the temperatu re of 50-degrees-C of the samples (Fig. 2) remarkable differencies are not obvious for different heating times and for pasteurized or raw mi lk. During simultaneous sample analyses on the Milko-Scan and Fossomat ic apparatuses it is necessary to keep 40-degrees-C warm samples in ba th for 25 minutes, otherwise an analysis of milk substantial compositi on could be devaluated. In the test 2 dynamics of number of SB in depe ndence on the time and temperature of the sample heating (Fig. 3) was observed. The samples of raw and pasteurized milk treated by the N, 1) and P were measured (24 hours after sampling at 4-degrees-C, before m easurement of temperature treatment under laboratory temperature). The lowest number of SB was found out during the first measurement in the samples 14-degrees-C warm put in the bath. The average values of four basin samples, measured duplicitously were as follows: 250, 292 and 2 96 thousand per ml for raw milk and 336, 307 and 309 thousand per ml f or pasteurized milk treated by N, D and P. Each sample was put agam in to bath after measurement and at about in 11 minutes, when the whole s et was measured, it was again tested. During cca two hour measurement relatively balanced results were reached. For the samples of pasteuriz ed milk higher average numbers were found out against the samples of r aw milk: for N 351 thousand per ml versus 274 thousand per ml, for D 3 33 thousand per ml versus 309 thousand per ml and for B 339 thousand p er ml versus 306 thousand per ml. The tests 1 and 2 confirmed that the higher SB numbers found out in the samples of pasteunzed milk are due to more intensive colouring reaction, which is at the same time highe r for preserved samples against unpreserved. In the test 3 where five basin samples were sampled by four samplers the influence of particula r samplers was not manifested on the SB number (Tab. II), which howeve r need not to be of general validity under another conditions.