The effect of self-reference on recall bias for pain stimuli was compa
red in chronic pain patients and controls. It was hypothesized that se
lf-referential encoding would result in better recall of pain stimuli
in chronic pain patients. In contrast, it was predicted that a non-pai
n control group would display no recall bias for pain-associated stimu
li, regardless of the encoding reference. Subjects were tested in two
conditions. The first condition (self-referential) involved encoding a
list of words constructed from sensory pain, affective and neutral wo
rds. Elaboration at the encoding stage was achieved by asking subjects
to imagine themselves in situations involving these words. Subjects w
ere also asked to rate the likelihood of these situations occurring on
a scale of 1 to 5 (from 1 = 'will not happen' to 5 = 'certain to happ
en'). The second condition (other-person reference) repeated this task
in reference to another person with a matched list of words. A 2 x 2
x 3 factorial analysis of variance based on group x reference (self an
d other) x word type (sensory, affective and neutral) was carried out
on recall scores, with the likelihood ratings as a covariate. Results
reveal a significant three-way interaction. The analysis indicated tha
t, while pain patients show an increase in recall of sensory words and
a decrease in recall of neutral words when these are encoded in refer
ence to themselves, control subjects show no difference in recall of t
hese word types regardless of the encoding condition. The results supp
ort the notion that pain patients selectively recall more pain-associa
ted words in comparison with other word types. However, this effect is
only true for stimuli encoded in reference to themselves. It is propo
sed that this processing bias may contribute to the maintenance of a s
ense of helplessness and exacerbate the emotional impact of the pain e
xperience.