COMPETENCES FOR PART-II OF THE EXAMINATION FOR MEMBERSHIP OF THE FACULTY OF PUBLIC-HEALTH MEDICINE

Citation
Sr. Kisely et Spb. Donnan, COMPETENCES FOR PART-II OF THE EXAMINATION FOR MEMBERSHIP OF THE FACULTY OF PUBLIC-HEALTH MEDICINE, Journal of public health medicine, 19(1), 1997, pp. 11-17
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
09574832
Volume
19
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
11 - 17
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-4832(1997)19:1<11:CFPOTE>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Background The assessment of competence is of growing importance in mo dern educational theory. This paper reports the results of a study to investigate the views of Part II examiners and public health trainees about whether an agreed list of competencies for the practice of publi c health medicine could be determined. Methods A postal questionnaire was sent to Part II examiners and representatives of the Trainee Membe rs Committee of the Faculty of Public Health Medicine. Result A total of 90 questionnaires were sent. Seventy per cent of Part II examiners and 70 per cent of the Trainee Members Committee returned questionnair es. There was a high degree of consensus amongst respondents that most of the skills listed in the Faculty Handbook as being necessary for t he completion of training should form core competencies for the Part I I examination. Sections of the syllabus dealing with epidemiology and disease prevention were also seen as core competencies. There was less support for the assessment of attitudes or other sections of the Hand book syllabus. The written reports and oral examination were seen as b eing complementary, with respondents listing different competencies as being appropriately assessed by the two methods, There was little sup port for the introduction of a standardized skills examination. Conclu sions This is the first study to assess the face validity of possible components for the Part II examination using the views of both trainee s and Part II examiners. This could form the first step to the introdu ction of an agreed set of competency areas into the examination.