Differences between conventional and sustainable paradigms of agricult
ure are much more a matter of differences in farming philosophy than o
f farming practices or methods. The conventional model of agriculture
is fundamentally an industrial development model which views farms as
factories and considers fields, plants, and animals as production unit
s. The goal of industrial development is to increase human well-being
by increasing production of material goods and services and simultaneo
usly increasing aggregate employment and incomes. The underlying assum
ption of the industrial model is that a higher quality of life can be
derived from increases in income and consumption of goods and services
. A fundamental strategy for industrial development has been to specia
lize, routinize, and mechanize agricultural production in order to ach
ieve the economic efficiencies that are inherent in large-scale indust
rial production. New technologies are designed to remove physical and
biological constraints to production and, thus, make unlimited progres
s possible. Sustainable agriculture, on the other hand, is based on a
holistic paradigm or model of development which views production units
as organisms that consist of many complex interrelated suborganisms,
all of which have distinct physical, biological, and social limits. Pe
ople are viewed as part of the organisms or systems from which they de
rive their well-being. Quality of life is considered to be a consequen
ce of interrelationships among people and between people and the other
physical and biological elements of their environment. Fundamental st
rategies for sustainable development include diversification, integrat
ion, and synthesis. Whole systems have qualities and characteristics t
hat are not contained in their individual parts or components. The sam
e set of components or parts may be rearranged spatially or sequential
ly resulting in a unique system or whole for each new arrangement. Peo
ple increase their well-being by using information and knowledge to ma
nage or rearrange the components of systems, resources, processes, and
technologies in ways that enhance the productivity or 'well-being' of
those systems. Human progress is limited only by our ability to enhan
ce the social, biological, and physical systems of which we are a part
. Sustainable agriculture requires a holistic systems approach to farm
resource management. A component approach focusing on individual farm
ing practices, methods, and enterprises may have been appropriate for
the era of agricultural industrialization. However, a systems approach
which focuses on knowledge-based development of whole farms and commu
nities will be required to address the environmental, economic, and so
cial challenges of the post-industrial era of agricultural sustainabil
ity.