B. Griffin et al., RESPONSE OF PLASMA LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN SUBFRACTIONS TO ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY FOLLOWING SURGICAL MENOPAUSE, Clinical endocrinology, 39(4), 1993, pp. 463-468
OBJECTIVE Epidemiological studies suggest that postmenopausal oestroge
n replacement reduces the incidence of cardiovascular disease. The pur
pose of this study was to establish the effects of oestrogen replaceme
nt therapy on subfractions of plasma low density lipoprotein in bilate
rally oophorectomized women. DESIGN In a placebo controlled, double-bl
ind study, patients were randomized on a two to one basis to receive e
ither oestradiol valerate (2 mg/day) or placebo respectively for a per
iod of 16 weeks. PATIENTS Seventeen women aged 28-51 years who had all
had hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy at least 2 months before
recruitment were assigned to either the active (n = 12) or placebo (n
= 5) group. MEASUREMENTS Plasma lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins
and LDL subfractions were determined immediately before and after the
treatment period. LDL subfractions were isolated directly from plasma
by density gradient ultracentrifugation within 24 hours. Non-parametri
c statistical analysis was carried out within each group using Wilcoxo
n's signed rank test for matched pairs. RESULTS After 16 weeks of trea
tment, HDL cholesterol, apo A-1 and HDL-2 were increased in the group
receiving oestrogen (HDL cholesterol +12%, P < 0.01; apo A-I + 14%, P
< 0.01; HDL-2 + 24% P < 0-01). While there were no significant changes
in serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol or triglycerides, the proportio
n and concentration of the least dense LDL-I subfraction was decreased
significantly (27%, P < 0.05). The LDL subfraction of intermediate de
nsity (LDL-II) was decreased in eight subjects, while small, dense LDL
-III was unaffected. Overall, these changes resulted in an apparent sh
ift in the distribution of LDL subfractions towards small, dense LDL-I
II, although there was no net increase in the latter. CONCLUSION In vi
ew of a similar and characteristic response of LDL subfractions to hyp
olipidaemic drugs that enhance the clearance of LDL via the LDL recept
or, the present findings suggest that oestrogen promotes the preferent
ial removal of LDL-I and II by activating LDL receptors. As this effec
t is normally associated with a reduction in the circulating level of
LDL, it should not be regarded as an unfavourable response to oestroge
n replacement therapy.