Objective-To examine the impact of menopausal symptoms on the overall
quality of life of women. Design-Data collection with a questionnaire
administered by an interviewer, incorporating two different quality of
life measurement techniques (time trade off and rating scale). Settin
g-Specialist menopause clinic and two general practices in Oxford. Sub
jects-63 women aged 45-60 years recruited opportunistically during a c
linic or appointment with a general practitioner; no exclusion criteri
a. Results-Subjects gave very low quality of life ratings for health s
tates with menopausal symptoms. The time trade off method of measuring
preferences for these health states (on a scale from 0 to 1, where pr
eference for full health is given as 1) yielded utility values of 0.64
for severe menopausal symptoms and 0.85 for mild symptoms. The rating
scale measurement technique yielded even lower values: utilities of 0
.30 and 0.65 were obtained for severe and mild symptoms respectively.
Kappa scores indicated that the two methods produced results that were
poorly related but not contradictory. Comparison of quality of life r
atings before and after treatment with hormone replacement therapy sho
wed significant improvements: with the rating scale measurement techni
que mean increases in utility values after the relief of severe and mi
ld menopausal symptoms were 0.56 and 0.18 respectively. Conclusions-Qu
ality of life may be severely compromised in women with menopausal sym
ptoms, and perceived improvements in quality of life in users of hormo
ne replacement therapy seem to be substantial. This emphasises the nee
d to include quality of life measurements when assessing outcomes of h
ormone replacement therapy. Several limitations may exist with widely
applied measurement techniques, calling for the development of appropr
iate and well validated instruments for measuring quality of life asso
ciated with reduced health states.