E. Osterberg et al., COMPARISON OF POLYSACCHARIDE AND POLY(ETHYLENE GLYCOL) COATINGS FOR REDUCTION OF PROTEIN ADSORPTION ON POLYSTYRENE SURFACES, Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects, 77(2), 1993, pp. 159-169
There has been much recent interest in the use of poly(ethylene glycol
)s (PEGs) for a variety of biotechnical applications. In the present w
ork we have immobilized several cellulose derivatives and dextran on p
olystyrene surfaces and have measured the extent of fibrinogen adsorpt
ion onto the coated surfaces. Immobilization was achieved by adsorptio
n onto clean polystyrene and by covalent linkage of oxidized polysacch
arides to polyethylenimine which was ionically bound to polystyrene. C
ovalently bound polysaccharides, and adsorbed polysaccharides that are
strongly held, compare well with poly(ethylene glycol) in preventing
fibrinogen adsorption. The same polymers were coupled to polystyrene l
atex particles to permit examination by analytical microparticle elect
rophoresis. This investigation suggests that adsorbed polysaccharides
form thicker layers than do covalently bound polysaccharides. Despite
the polysaccharides being bound at many points along the polymer chain
while PEG is bound only at the polymer terminus, the functional equiv
alence of polysaccharide and PEG coatings is of significance in interp
reting the protein-rejecting ability of polymer-modified surfaces.