OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS IN RELATION TO LEUKEMIA AND BRAIN-TUMORS - A CASE-CONTROL STUDY IN SWEDEN

Citation
B. Floderus et al., OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS IN RELATION TO LEUKEMIA AND BRAIN-TUMORS - A CASE-CONTROL STUDY IN SWEDEN, CCC. Cancer causes & control, 4(5), 1993, pp. 465-476
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
09575243
Volume
4
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
465 - 476
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-5243(1993)4:5<465:OETEIR>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Occupational exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) wa s studied in 250 leukemia patients and 261 brain-tumor cases, diagnose d in 1983-87 and compared with a control group of 1,121 randomly selec ted men, from the mid-region of Sweden, 1983-87. We based the exposure assessment on measurements from 1,015 different workplaces. On the ba sis of the job held longest during the 1 0-year period before diagnosi s, we found an association between the average, daily, mean level of E MF and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The risk increased with inc reasing level of exposure. The odds ratios (OR) and the 95 percent con fidence interval (CI) for three consecutive levels of exposure were: 1 .1 (CI = 0.5-2.3); 2.2 (CI = 1.1-4.3); 3.0 (CI = 1.65. 8), respectivel y. No association was observed for acute myeloid leukemia (OR = 1.0, C I = 0.5-1.8; OR = 0.8, CI = 0.4-1.6; OR = 1.0, CI = 0.6-1.9). For brai n tumors, the corresponding risk estimates were 1.0 (CI = 0.7-1.6); 1. 5 (CI = 1.0-2.2); 1.4 (CI = 0.9-2.1). Different EMF indices were teste d. Tasks with frequent or large variations between high and low field- densities (high standard deviation) were more common among CLL subject s. For brain tumors, a prolonged high level (high median values) showe d the strongest association. Confounding by place of residence, smokin g, benzene, ionizing radiation, pesticides, and solvents was evaluated , and these factors did not seem to have a decisive influence on the a ssociations. We also analyzed other potential sources of bias. For CLL , there were indications of an excess number of low-exposure subjects among non-responders, which, to some extent, may have enhanced but not caused the risk estimates obtained. Our conclusion is that the study supports the hypothesis that occupational EMF exposure is a hazard in the development of certain cancers.