DOPAMINERGIC ANTAGONISM WITHIN THE NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS OR THE AMYGDALA PRODUCES DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS ON INTRAVENOUS COCAINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION UNDER FIXED AND PROGRESSIVE RATIO SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT

Citation
A. Mcgregor et Dcs. Roberts, DOPAMINERGIC ANTAGONISM WITHIN THE NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS OR THE AMYGDALA PRODUCES DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS ON INTRAVENOUS COCAINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION UNDER FIXED AND PROGRESSIVE RATIO SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT, Brain research, 624(1-2), 1993, pp. 245-252
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00068993
Volume
624
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1993
Pages
245 - 252
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8993(1993)624:1-2<245:DAWTNO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Bilateral intracerebral injections of the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, were administered into the nucleus accumbens (NACC) or amygdala (AMY) immediately prior to an i.v. cocaine self-administration sessio n. Injection into both sites produced a dose-dependent (0.1-2.0 mug/in jection) increase in the rate of cocaine self-administration under a f ixed ratio (FR) schedule of reinforcement (1.5 mg/kg/injection). Howev er, injection into the AMY produced a significantly greater increase i n rate of drug intake than within the NACC. In contrast, under a progr essive ratio (PR) schedule of cocaine reinforcement the D1 antagonist had very little effect within the AMY on break point (BP) but greatly reduced the BP following injection into the NACC. A locomotor activity study revealed that following systemic injection of cocaine (10 mg/kg i.p.), SCH 23390 (1.0 mug/injection site) significantly reduced activ ity to comparable levels following injection into either brain site. T his indicates that the dissociation of effects between the two neural sites within the cocaine self-administration paradigm does not appear to be due to greater locomotor reducing actions of the antagonist with in the NACC. These results demonstrate that a significant contribution is made by AMY dopamine to cocaine reinforcement mechanisms, which ap pears to be different to that of the NACC. Moreover, they suggest that FR and PR schedules may measure different aspects of cocaine's CNS ac tion which support self-administration behaviour.