Ah. Fredeen et Re. Mcqueen, EFFECT OF ENZYME ADDITIVES ON QUALITY OF ALFALFA GRASS-SILAGE AND DAIRY-COW PERFORMANCE, Canadian journal of animal science, 73(3), 1993, pp. 581-591
First- and second-cut alfalfa/grass forage crops were wilted to approx
imately 40% dry matter (DM) and ensiled untreated (control) or treated
with either of two enzyme additives to determine the effects on silag
e quality and animal performance of crops that contain different ratio
s of legume to grass. An alfalfa enzyme mix (Alfa) contained cellulase
, amylase and glucose oxidase: a grass enzyme mix (Grass) was similar
but contained no amylase. Both additives contained identical inoculant
s of lactobacillus. Silage was fed to mid-lactation Holstein cows at 6
0 d (second cut) and 120 d (first cut) postensiling using repeated Lat
in square designs. Silage samples and animal performance data were col
lected during the last 7 d of each of three 28-d feeding periods that
comprised each Latin square. Colony-forming units of lactic acid bacte
ria. concentrations of water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC), ammonia N, ac
id-detergent fiber N and organic acids. pH, DM disappearance, and temp
erature changes during ensiling were measured to assess silage quality
. Six sheep were also used in a repeated Latin square design to determ
ine digestibility of the second-cut silages. First-cut silage, which c
ontained about 50% timothy, and 50% alfalfa was qualitatively similar
across treatments except for a lower (P < 0.05) concentration of hemic
ellulose in Grass-treated silage. The only effect (P < 0.05) on qualit
y of second-cut silage, which contained about 80% alfalfa and 20% timo
thy, was an increase in estimated DM loss in Grass-treated silage comp
ared with Alfa and the control. Despite the negligible effects on sila
ge quality parameters. Grass slightly depressed (P < 0.10) the yield o
f fat-corrected milk in cows fed first-cut silage, and DM intake of co
ws fed second-cut forage was elevated slightly (P < 0.05) and fat perc
ent was depressed (P < 0.05) by Alfa relative to the control. Conseque
ntly, although the change was small, enzyme treatment of forages may r
epresent a means of reducing the fat percent of milk. Sheep consumed m
ore (P < 0.05) second-cut silage treated with Alfa, and DM digestibili
ty was higher (P = 0.09) when compared with the control. An enzyme mix
ture containing amylase may be marginally more effective when forage m
ixtures contain more alfalfa than timothy.