NO EVIDENCE FOR FEEDBACK INHIBITION OF HEPATIC APOLIPOPROTEIN-B (APO-B) PRODUCTION AFTER EXTRACORPOREAL LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN PRECIPITATION AS DETERMINED BY [1-C-13]LEUCINE INFUSION IN NORMAL VOLUNTEERS
J. Arends et al., NO EVIDENCE FOR FEEDBACK INHIBITION OF HEPATIC APOLIPOPROTEIN-B (APO-B) PRODUCTION AFTER EXTRACORPOREAL LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN PRECIPITATION AS DETERMINED BY [1-C-13]LEUCINE INFUSION IN NORMAL VOLUNTEERS, European journal of clinical investigation, 23(10), 1993, pp. 602-614
To determine the impact of an acute reduction of the circulating mass
of apolipoprotein B (apo B) on apo B metabolism we studied six healthy
male volunteers before (day 0), 1 day after (day 2), and 7 days after
(day 8) an LDL apheresis treatment which reduced apo B mass by 59%. A
ppearance of newly synthesized apo B in plasma VLDL and LDL was studie
d using a primed-constant infusion of [1-C-13]-leucine. VLDL apo B poo
l size and fractional VLDL apo B production rate calculated using a on
e-compartment model were similar on all 3 study days. Absolute VLDL ap
o B production was not statistically different throughout the study (1
9.7 +/- 12.3, 19.5 +/- 7.5, 29.1 +/- 17.7 mg kg-1 day-1). LDL apo B fr
actional production rate was increased on day 2 (0.38 +/- 0.17, 0.68 /- 0.08, 0.37 +/- 0.06 pools day-1 on days 0, 2, and 8; P < 0-0 1). Ab
solute LDL apo B production, however, remained constant throughout the
study (10.8 +/- 3.3, 11.0 +/- 1.9, 10.8 +/- 3.1 mg kg-1 day-1). We co
nclude that in healthy male volunteers acute reduction of the circulat
ing apo B mass by LDL apheresis does not affect apo B metabolism signi
ficantly.