Immune mechanisms superimposed to the myeloablative conditioning regim
ens exert an additional powerful effect in eradicating leukemia and in
achieving immunological control of minimal residual disease. The impa
ct of GVHD-independent GVL has been evaluated to be absent, or near ab
sent, in ALL, about 30% in AML and about 40% in CML. While until littl
e time ago most of the evidence in favor of an immune antileukemia mec
hanism exerted by allo BMT in CML was indirect, based on the lack of G
VL, there is now solid evidence of a positive type, based on the antil
eukemia effect of donor lymphocyte infusions in patients having relaps
ed after transplant. There are three lines of indirect clinical eviden
ce for GVL in CML: they include the classical linkage between GVHD and
reduced relapse rate, increased relapse rate after identical twin all
ografts, and increased relapse risk after effective GVHD prophylaxis,
with T lymphocyte depletion in the foreground. The eradicating effects
of donor lymphocyte infusions in relapsed patients are the ultimate d
emonstration that allogeneic immune competent cells are capable of rec
ognizing and destroying the Ph-positive clone. However the frequency o
f irreversible aplasia indicates that donor lymphocytes act in the sam
e way on residual host hematopoiesis, so that a second graft, without
repeat conditioning, should be programmed for such cases.