A highly successful strategy for the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma is Co
ntrite Tit For Tat, which bases its decisions on the ''standings'' of
the two players. This strategy is as good as Tit For Tat at invading p
opulations of defectors, and much better at overcoming errors in imple
mentation against players who are also using it. However, it is vulner
able to errors in perception. In this paper, we discuss the merits of
Contrite Tit For Tat and compare it with other strategies, like Pavlov
and the newly-introduced Remorse. We embed these strategies into an e
ight-dimensional space of stochastic strategies which we investigate b
y analytical means and numerical simulations. Finally, we show that if
one replaces the conventions concerning the ''standing'' by other, ev
en simpler conventions, one obtains an evolutionarily stable strategy
(called Prudent Pavlov) which is immune against both mis-perception an
d mis-implementation. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.