Te. Mandel et al., CELLULAR REJECTION OF FETAL PANCREAS GRAFTS - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ALLOGRAFT AND XENOGRAFT REJECTION, Xenotransplantation, 4(1), 1997, pp. 2-10
Hyperacute rejection (HAR) is the major immunologic problem with vascu
larized xenografts between discordant donor/recipient combinations but
does not occur in neovascularized grafts of organ-cultured fetal pig
pancreas in either mice or cynomolgus monkeys. However, a form of cell
-mediated acute rejection with quite different histopathologic feature
s does occur with kinetics that are similar to acute cellular rejectio
n of fetal pancreas allografts in non-immunosuppressed MHC-mismatched
mice. Xenograft rejection is dominated by nonlymphoid cells, mostly eo
sinophils, that appear some days after transplantation. In contrast, i
n mouse allografts, mononuclear cells are the dominant population thro
ughout the rejection process. The rejected allograft site rapidly reso
lves to form a mature non-infiltrated scar whereas the infiltrate in t
he xenograft site remains for weeks and forms a large granuloma before
its eventual resolution. There are also differences in the intra-graf
t cytokine profile in the graft site between allo- and xenografts duri
ng acute rejection with an early predominance of IL-5 and TNF-alpha an
d an absence of INF-gamma in the xenografts. Immunosuppression with a
depleting anti-CD4 mAb shows that xenograft rejection is more dependen
t on CD4+ve T cells but xenografts are more difficult to maintain with
conventional immunosuppression that is often effective for allografts
. Limited studies in primates have shown that the histopathology of fe
tal pig pancreas rejection is similar to that seen in mice but occurs
at a faster tempo. Thus, although HAR may not be a problem in rejectio
n of neovascularised xenografts, a vigorous form of cellular rejection
is present that may require different immunosuppression than is usual
ly used for the control of allograft rejection.