M. Delarue et al., ANTEROPOSTERIOR SEGREGATION OF SUPERFICIAL AND DEEP CELLS DURING GASTRULATION IN PLEURODELES WALTL AND RANA-PIPIENS EMBRYOS, The Journal of experimental zoology, 276(5), 1996, pp. 345-360
Segregation of dorsal superficial and deep cells was analyzed in early
Pleurodeles waltl (urodele) and Rana pipiens (anuran) gastrulae in or
der to gain new comparative insights into anterior and posterior speci
fication of mesodermally fated cells in species other than Xenopus. We
used a novel technique of orthotopic transplantation of double-labele
d grafts into defined regions. This technique involves labeling all ce
lls in grafts with a rhodamine-lysinated dextran (RLDx) cell lineage t
racer (by injecting uncleaved eggs) and subsequently labeling superfic
ial cells with I-125. Small defined grafts of the dorsal marginal zone
(DMZ) were placed orthotopically into unlabeled host embryos. RLDx wa
s also used to label individual superficial cells in the early gastrul
a dorsal midline region as well as large blastomeres in the presumptiv
e DMZ at the 32-cell stage. Labeled progeny were studied in gastrulae
and neurulae. The distribution of dorsal mesodermal cells depends on s
egregation between superficial and deep cells which occurs along the a
nteroposterior axis during involution in both species studied here. De
ep cells are the first to involute. Then they divide into two subpopul
ations during gastrulation. The first anterior subpopulation migrates
with only a few superficial cells. The second, more posterior, subpopu
lation involutes later and codistributes with most of the superficial
cell population. Our results indicate that at the beginning of gastrul
ation, much greater mixing between superficial and deep cells occurs i
n Pleurodeles than in Rana. These results may have bearing on studies
of the mechanism of anteroposterior specification of amphibian mesoder
m. Differences in the timing and topology of expression of cell:cell a
nd cell:substrate adhesion molecules between these amphibian species i
n early development could account for observed differences in morphoge
netic cell movements. (C) 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.