INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN USE OF DIAGRAMS AS EXTERNAL MEMORY IN MECHANICAL REASONING

Citation
M. Hegarty et K. Steinhoff, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN USE OF DIAGRAMS AS EXTERNAL MEMORY IN MECHANICAL REASONING, Learning and individual differences, 9(1), 1997, pp. 19-42
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational
ISSN journal
10416080
Volume
9
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
19 - 42
Database
ISI
SICI code
1041-6080(1997)9:1<19:IIUODA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Participants in two experiments solved mechanical reasoning problems t hat involved inferring the motion of components of mechanical systems from static diagrams of the systems. Some participants were allowed to make notes on the diagrams while solving these problems and others we re not. Previous research shows that low-spatial individuals have diff iculty solving these problems, possibly because they have limited spat ial working memory capacity. We predicted that participants would make notes on the diagram indicating the inferred motion of each component and that making notes in this way would improve performance, particul arly for low-spatial participants. Consistent with previous research ( Hegarty & Sims 1994), low-spatial participants made more errors than h igh-spatial participants. Participants made more notes on problems tha t placed high demands on working memory. Making notes on diagrams was associated with more accurate performance of low-spatial participants, but was not related to performance of high-spatial participants. The results are discussed in terms of working memory limitations and compe nsating metacognitive skills.