In 1991, the Public Health Service published the Strategic Plan for the Eli
mination of Childhood Lead Poisoning. This document marked a fundamental sh
ift in federal policy from finding and treating lead-poisoned children to a
uthentic primary prevention. It spelled out a 15-year strategy to achieve t
his goal and provided a cost benefit analysis showing that the monetized be
nefits far exceeded the costs of abatement. A strong national effort to eli
minate the disease developed. Now, 7 years after publication of the plan, p
rimary prevention of lead exposure has been abandoned.
This article examines the role of some prevailing attitudes and institution
s in derailing the effort. Some institutions-the lead industry, real estate
interests, and insurance interests-behaved as anticipated. Others, includi
ng private pediatricians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, some federal
agencies, and a public interest group ostensibly dedicated to eliminating l
ead poisoning, also played an unexpected part in derailing the plan.