The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and quantitative
Viral load assays has revolutionized the care of HIV-infected patients. Ho
wever, this paradigm shift has also had unexpected, sometimes adverse conse
quences that are not always obvious. Before antiretroviral therapy, physici
ans learned how to accompany patients through their illness; to bear witnes
s to sickness and dying; and to help patients and their families with suffe
ring, closure, and legacy. Since we have become better at treating the viru
s, a new temptation has emerged to dwell on quantitative aspects of HIV man
agement and monitoring. although the skills that we learned earlier in the
epidemic are no less necessary for providing good care. Our new-found thera
peutic capabilities should not distract us from the sometimes more difficul
t and necessary task of simply "being there" for patients for whom HAART is
no longer effective.
The definition and practice of end-of-life care for patients with AIDS will
continue to evolve as AIDS comes to resemble other chronic, treatable, but
ultimately fatal illnesses, such as end-stage pulmonary disease and metast
atic cancer, in which clinicians must continually readdress with their pati
ents the balance of curative and palliative interventions as the disease pr
ocess unfolds overtime. The coming challenge in HIV care will be to encoura
ge the maintenance of a "primary care" mentality-with attention to the larg
er psychosocial issues, end-of-life care, bereavement, and a focus on the p
atient as opposed to the illness-alongside our new antiretroviral paradigm.
Otherwise, we run the risk of forgetting what we learned about healing, fr
om a disease that we could not cure.