Most studies of both pari-mutuel and fixed-odds betting markets have shown
a systematic tendency for the expected return to bets at lower odds to exce
ed those at higher odds. Some work, however, has revealed in certain market
s the absence or even reversal of this bias. We present a model which disti
nguishes two separate types of better, and use this to demonstrate how tran
sactions costs, the extent of public information, and consumption benefits
of betting can explain the disparities. Our empirical evidence, taken from
a fixed-odds market, lends support to our theoretical conclusions.