Comparison of MIB-1 proliferation rates for eosinophilic renal tumors - Oncocytoma, chromophobe renal carcinoma, and eosinophilic variant of renal carcinoma
Dj. Dabbs et al., Comparison of MIB-1 proliferation rates for eosinophilic renal tumors - Oncocytoma, chromophobe renal carcinoma, and eosinophilic variant of renal carcinoma, APPL IMMUNO, 6(4), 1998, pp. 187-190
Eosinophilic renal tumors comprise a group of tumors that may have overlapp
ing morphologic features, including oncocytoma (O), chromophobe renal cell
carcinoma (CCC), and granular or eosinophilic cell carcinoma (ECC). The ove
rlap of cytologic atypia is well described, but there are no data on the pr
oliferation indices (PI) of these tumors. This study investigates the PI of
these tumors to ascertain correlations of morphologic parameters and wheth
er PI is diagnostically useful in separating them. We contributed a total o
f 21 oncocytomas, 32 CCC, and 12 ECC for this study. Histologic sections we
re examined, and immunoperoxidase was performed by the ABC technique with a
ntigen retrieval. MIB-1 index was generated manually by counting the number
of positive nuclei in 25 high-power fields. The PI for each group was comp
ared with tumor size, cytologic atypia, and the PI among all three groups w
as compared. There was substantial overlap of the PI between O and CCC, wit
h no significant difference of index means, yet 76% of O and only 28% of CC
C had an index >0.24. The mean index of tumors with index >0.24 was signifi
cantly higher for CCC compared with O. There was no correlation between the
PI, tumor size, or morphology between O and CCC. The PI of ECC was markedl
y higher than the PIs of O and CCC. Our conclusions are as follows: (1) PI
for O and CCC are markedly lower than for ECC; (2) PI cannot be used to dis
tinguish between O and CCC; and (3) There is a subset of CCC with markedly
elevated PI. Only meaningful clinical follow-up will substantiate the use o
f PI as a prognostic factor for CCC.