The ozone-depleting gas N2O is an intermediate in denitrification, the biol
ogical reduction of NO3- to the gaseous products N2O and N-2 gas. The molar
ratio of N2O produced (N2O/N2O + N-2) varies temporally and spatially, and
in some soils N2O may be the dominant end product of denitrification. The
fraction of NO3--N emitted as N2O may be due at least in part to the abunda
nce and activity of denitrifying bacteria which possess N2O reductase. In t
his study, we enumerated NO3-- reducing and denitrifying bacteria, and comp
ared and contrasted collections of denitrifying bacteria isolated from two
agricultural soils, one (Auxonne, soil A) with N2O as the dominant product
of denitrification, the other (Ch (a) over cap lons, soil C) with N-2 gas a
s the dominant product. Isolates were tested for the ability to reduce N2O,
and the presence of the N2O reductase (nosZ)-like gene was evaluated by po
lymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers coupled with DNA hybri
dization using a specific probe. The diversity and phylogenetic relationshi
ps of members of the collections were established by PCR/restriction fragme
nt length polymorphism of 16s rDNA. The two soils had similar numbers of ba
cteria which used NO3- as a terminal electron acceptor anaerobically. Howev
er, the soil A had many more denitrifiers which reduced NO3- to gaseous pro
ducts (N2O or N-2) than did soil C. Collections of 258 and 281 bacteria abl
e to grow anaerobically in the presence of NO3- were isolated from soil A a
nd soil C, respectively. These two collections contained 66 and 12 denitrif
ying isolates, respectively, the others reducing NO3- only as far as NO2-.
The presence of nosZ sequences was generally a poor predictor of N2O reduci
ng ability: there was agreement between the occurrence of nosZ sequences an
d the N2O reducing ability for only 42% of the isolates; 35% of the isolate
s (found exclusively in soil A) without detectable nosZ sequences reduced N
2O whereas 21% of the isolates carrying nosZ sequences did not reduce this
gas under our assay conditions. Twenty-eight different 16S rDNA restriction
patterns (using two restriction endonucleases) were distinguished among th
e 78 denitrifying isolates. Two types of patterns appeared to be common to
both soils. Twenty-three and three types of patterns were found exclusively
among bacteria isolated from soils A and C, respectively. The specific com
position of denitrifying communities appeared to be different between the t
wo soils studied. This may partly explain the differences in the behaviour
of the soils concerning N2O reduction during denitrification.