D. Freeman et al., The London East Anglia randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis IV: Self-esteem and persecutory delusions, BR J CL PSY, 37, 1998, pp. 415-430
Objectives. There has been a resurgence of interest in the view that persec
utory delusions serve a function of defending self-esteem. An alternative a
ccount of levels of self-esteem in individuals with persecutory delusions i
s that they result from processes similar to those studied in people with d
epression (i.e. from the occurrence of a range of life experiences and how
the individual interprets and copes with them). This study aimed to examine
both hypotheses together for the first time, and, as the literature indica
tes that delusions may not share a common cause, attention was given to the
possibility of the presence of subgroups.
Design. Data were examined cross-sectionally and longitudinally from a rand
omized controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy for 60 people with d
rug-resistant psychosis.
Method. The study is based on the initial assessment of all participants on
self-esteem, delusional conviction and a large number of demographic, clin
ical and cognitive measures. Longitudinal analyses were also carried out, a
nd are reported separately for those who received the therapy intervention
and those in the control group.
Results. Almost three-quarters of participants with persecutory delusions r
eported low self-esteem. Changes over time in total self-esteem correlated
with changes in measures of mood and social functioning, but not conviction
in persecutory delusions. The individuals who initially had normal levels
of self-esteem displayed a different pattern of results from the majority o
f participants.
Conclusion. Low self-esteem in people with drug-resistant persecutory delus
ions is common and, in most cases, can best be understood in terms of norma
l emotional processes. There was evidence that the majority of persecutory
delusions do not fit either strong or weak formulations of the delusion-as-
defence explanation and that there may be subgroups with differing aetiolog
ies. These results need to be replicated, and extended to groups in which s
ymptoms are not resistant to medication.