B. Sarubbi et al., Atrial fibrillation: What are the effects of drug therapy on the effectiveness and complications of electrical cardioversion?, CAN J CARD, 14(10), 1998, pp. 1267-1273
Aerial fibrillation is the most common cardiac rhythm disorder associated w
ith hospitalization. Two therapeutic options have been available: antiarrhy
thmic drug therapy, and external or internal electrical cardioversion. Elec
trical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation remains one of the most widely
used and effective treatments fur the restoration of normal sinus rhythm. H
owever, many patients continue to receive an antiarrythmic drug before and
after cardioversion in an attempt either to cardiovert the arrhythmia chemi
cally or to maintain sinus rhythm after successful cardioversion. Because s
ome pharmacological agents can affect the cardioversion procedure for aeria
l fibrillation or flutter, and because many patients with such arrhythmias
may require electrical cardioversion when they are taking antiarrhythmic dr
ugs, the question of a possible effect of drug therapy on the efficacy and
safety of electrical cardioversion of aerial fibrillation arises. Early rep
orts of direct current cardioversion provoking potentially lethal ventricul
ar arrhythmias raised suspecions of an arrhythmogenic role for digoxin anti
arrhythmic therapy, and it is customary to withhold these drugs for 24 to 4
8 h before cardioversion is attempted. However, this complication is likely
to arise only in patients who are close to, or actually manifesting, signs
of drug toxicity. On the other hand, treatment with therapeutic concentrat
ions of antiarrhythmic drugs before cardioversion may in some cases be asso
ciated with a significant reduction in the number of shocks and decreased e
nergy required to restore synus rhythm, a lower incidence of postshock arrh
ythmias and a reduced risk of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation.