A. Ravaioli et al., Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role ofthe main biological markers, CELL PROLIF, 31(3-4), 1998, pp. 113-126
In the medical literature there are frequently conflicting reports on the u
tility of biological tumour markers available in the clinical management of
breast cancer. In this review we analyse current information on the relati
onships between the most widely investigated breast cancer biological marke
rs including oestrogen and progesterone receptors, p53, Bcl-2, c-erbB-2, cy
clin expression, proliferative activity, DNA ploidy and the urokinase plasm
inogen activation system, as well as their relevance to prognosis and respo
nse to clinical treatment. By biological prognostic indicator, we mean a ma
rker that correlates with survival and disease-free survival; the term pred
ictor marker indicates a marker that is capable of predicting tumour sensit
ivity or resistance to various therapies. Similarly to other authors' exper
iences, our analysis suggests that oestrogen receptors are weak prognostic
indicators and good predictors of response to endocrine therapy. Furthermor
e, there are consistent data suggesting that proliferation indices are good
indicators of prognosis, and that they are directly related to response to
chemotherapy and closely related to response to hormonotherapy. On the con
trary, there is no evidence or conflicting data for all of the other biolog
ical markers. These should be considered in the context of randomized trial
s in order to precisely define their prognostic and predictive roles. p53 a
nd c-erbB-2 seem to be the most promising factors, but their use in routine
practice still needs validation.