The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) was developed and validated origina
lly by Russell and colleagues as an evaluative assessment of gross motor fu
nction in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The present study reports the
results of reliability and validity testing of the GMFM for use with childr
en with Down syndrome (DS). One hundred and twenty-three children with DS w
ere assessed twice over a 6-month period, using the GMFM and the motor scal
e of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development - second edition (BSID-II). In
addition to the usual method of scoring the GMFM. using only observed moto
r behaviours (standard score), parent reports of children's activities not
seen by the assessor on the day of testing were also obtained and a second
score (reported score) was calculated for each GMFM assessment. Test-retest
and interrater reliabilities were excellent (all > 0.90). Observed correla
tions between change on GMFM and judgements of change made independently by
parents, interveners, and masked video raters were lower than hypothesized
. However, the pattern of change scores in predefined age and severity subg
roups supported the contention that the GMFM was able to detect differentia
l amounts of change as predicted. The GMFM was shown to be relatively more
responsive to change in gross motor function than the motor scale of the BS
ID-II. The 'reported' scores on the GMFM demonstrated better evidence of re
liability, validity, and responsiveness than the standard scoring method an
d this approach is recommended for use when assessing children with DS.