Does erythrocyte infusion improve 3.2-km run performance at high altitude?

Citation
Kb. Pandolf et al., Does erythrocyte infusion improve 3.2-km run performance at high altitude?, EUR J A PHY, 79(1), 1998, pp. 1-6
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03015548 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1 - 6
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-5548(199812)79:1<1:DEII3R>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The effects of autologous erythrocyte infusion on improving exercise perfor mance at high altitude have not previously been studied. The effects of ery throcyte infusion on 3.2-km (2-mile) run performance were evaluated during 3 days (HA3) and 14 days (HA14) exposure to high altitude (4300 m) in eryth rocyte-infused (ER) and control (CON) subjects that were initially matched (P > 0.05; n = 8 in each group) for age, body size and aerobic fitness. Aft er sea-level runs (SL; 50m), unacclimated-male subjects received either 700 mi of saline and autologous erythrocytes (42% hematocrit; ER) or saline al one (CON). The 3.2-km run times (min:s) did not differ (P > 0.05) between g roups at SL [mean (SEM) ER, 13:14 (00:19); CON, 13:39 (00:32)] or during HA 3 [ER, 19:02 (00:18); CON, 19:44 (00:43)] and HA14 [ER, 17:44 (00:27); CON, 18:45 (00:55)] but times were slower (P < 0.05) when comparing HA3 or HA14 to SL. Heart rates (HR) did not differ between groups at SL [ER, 188 (3) b eats min(-1); CON, 191 (3) beats.min(-1)], or during HA3 [ER, 170 (4)beats. min(-1); CON, 178 (4)beats.min(-1)] and HA14 [ER, 162 (6) beats min CON, 16 9 (5) beats.min(-1)] but HR were lower (P < 0.05) when comparing HA3 or HA1 4 to SL. Ratings of perceived exertion (local, central, and overall ratings ) did not differ between groups at SL, HA3 or HA14, but local ratings were higher(P < 0.05) at HA3 and HA14 compared to SL, and overall ratings were h igher for HA3 than SL. Analysis of covariance (adjusted fbr SL group run ti mes) revealed (min:s) 00:14 (HA3) and 00:28 (HA14) mean improvement tendenc ies (P > 0.05) for ER compared to CON. Thus, no significant improvements in 3.2-km run performance were associated with erythrocyte infusion, although the ER group showed a tendency to run slightly faster at high altitude.