Gw. Bota et al., A TRUNCATED E-CODE SYSTEM FOR INJURY SURVEILLANCE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - DESCRIPTION AND CLINOMETRIC TESTING, Academic emergency medicine, 4(4), 1997, pp. 291-296
Objectives: ED injury surveillance requires accurate information about
mechanism. This study explored the clinometric properties of an E-cod
e system specifically designed to track ED injuries. Methods: All pati
ents assessed in the ED had cause-of-injury information documented usi
ng a truncated E-code system. Patient records were hand-searched to de
termine coding compliance. A selection of 98 charts (50 injury/48 noni
njury) were coded by 7 physicians, 2 nurses, and 2 nosologists. Agreem
ents (interrater and intrarater) on the diagnosis of trauma and exact
E-codes were determined (using kappa; kappa). Results: E-coding compli
ance was high (overall 90%: 95% CI: 85-93%), and accuracy of injury cl
assification was 99%. Compared with an expert's coding, agreement on i
njury classification was excellent for physicians (kappa = 0.91; 95% C
I: 0.80-1.0), nurses (kappa = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.75-1.0), and nosologists
(kappa = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.81-1.0). Agreement was substantial for the e
xact E-codes between physicians (kappa = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60-0.94) and
nurses (kappa = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90). Recode reliability was also
excellent for physicians (kappa = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.75-1.0) and nurses (
kappa = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.88-1.0). Conclusions: Injury coding using a tr
uncated E-code system can provide valid and reliable data from the ED.
Differences between nurses, physicians, and nosologists in the abilit
y to accurately code using this system were minimal, thus eliminating
the need for additional staff and resources.