Methodological and analytical aspects of simple methods for measuring iodine in urine. Comparison with HPLC and Technicon Autoanalyzer II

Citation
D. Bier et al., Methodological and analytical aspects of simple methods for measuring iodine in urine. Comparison with HPLC and Technicon Autoanalyzer II, EXP CL E D, 106, 1998, pp. S27-S31
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES
ISSN journal
09477349 → ACNP
Volume
106
Year of publication
1998
Supplement
3
Pages
S27 - S31
Database
ISI
SICI code
0947-7349(1998)106:<S27:MAAAOS>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
This work describes an optimization of a simple photometric determination o f iodine concentrations in urine using a modified eerie arsenite method wit h ammonium persulfate as oxidant. By means of this sensitive method iodine concentrations can be determined in very small specimens (50 mu L). Urine s amples (105) collected from a mixed population, were analyzed for urine iod ine content by the optimized ammonium persulfate method a Technicon Autoana lyzer II and a paired-ion-RP HPLC. We found that the precision of this opti mized ammonium persulfate method yields inter assay CVs of <10% for urinary iodine concentrations >10 mu g/dL. Recovery of [I-123]iodide added to urin e in vitro was 100.9 +/- 2.4%. The detection limit was 0.0029 mu g iodine. There was a high correlation between all three methods (r > 0.94 in any cas e) and the interpretation of the results was consistent. We conclude that t his simple, manual ammonium persulfate method is suitable for urinary iodin e analysis and can be performed in any routine clinical laboratory.