Background & Aims: Antibiotic prophylaxis in severe pancreatitis has recent
ly yielded promising clinical results, with imipenem significantly reducing
the incidence of infected necrosis compared with an untreated control grou
p. On the bases of pefloxacin's spectrum of action and pancreatic penetrati
on, we investigated whether such drugs represent a valid alternative to imi
penem, Methods: In a multicenter study, 60 patients with severe acute pancr
eatitis with necrosis affecting at least 50% of the pancreas were randomly
allocated to receive intravenous treatment for 2 weeks with pefloxacin, 400
mg twice daily (30 patients), or imipenem, 500 mg three times daily (30 pa
tients), within 120 hours of onset of symptoms. Age, sex, body weight, Rans
on and Apache II scores, C-reactive protein, etiology, and time from onset
of symptoms to treatment were well matched in the two groups. Results: The
incidences of infected necrosis and extrapancreatic infections were 34% and
44%, respectively, in the pefloxacin group and 10% and 20% in the imipenem
group. Imipenem proved significantly more effective in prevention of pancr
eatic infections (P less than or equal to 0.05), Mortality was not signific
antly different in the two groups. Conclusions: Despite its theoretical pot
ential, pefloxacin is inferior to imipenem in the prevention of infections
associated with severe pancreatitis.