Objective To assess and compare damage to tissue during laparoscopic and co
nventional hysterectomies.
Design Prospective clinical study.
Setting Department of Gynaecology, Baby-Friendly Hospital, Kladno, Czech Re
public.
Subjects 95 women who had undergone laparoscopic, abdominal or vaginal hyst
erectomy.
Main outcome measures The operative trauma and tissue damage were assessed
using the enzymatic activity of creatine kinase (CK). Serum levels of CK we
re measured in 85 patients who had undergone hysterectomy, and the activiti
es of CK, isoenzyme CK-MB and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were investi
gated in seven patients of an additional group.
Results The rate of CK activity was significantly greater in 28 patients wh
o underwent abdominal hysterectomy (P < 0.005) compared with that in the pa
tients who underwent laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomies (34 and 23 pati
ents, respectively). The CK levels in the latter two groups were also signi
ficantly different (P < 0.025).
Conclusion Following total abdominal hysterectomy, tissue damage, as assess
ed by the activity of creatine kinase, is statistically significantly great
er than that following laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomies. Clinical ex
perience and metabolic changes indicate that the perioperative stress in pa
tients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy is lower than that in patients
where an abdominal approach is used. Large prospective studies are needed t
o evaluate the surgical trauma and metabolic changes induced by laparoscopi
c hysterectomy.