Ge. Thorncroft et Jf. Klausner, A CAPACITANCE SENSOR FOR 2-PHASE LIQUID-FILM THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS IN A SQUARE DUCT, Journal of fluids engineering, 119(1), 1997, pp. 164-169
The use of capacitance sensors for measuring liquid film thickness or
phase concentration in two-phase flow has gained popularity in recent
years. In designing such sensors, there are many issues which must be
considered in order to optimize performance: desired temporal and spat
ial resolution, two-phase flow regime, permittivity of the phases, duc
t geometry, electrical shielding, and temperature variation in the flo
w field. These issues are discussed, and the design of a 12.7 mm squar
e cross section capacitance sensor which measures liquid film thicknes
s in either stratified or annular two-phase flow is presented. Using a
composite material analysis and an effective permittivity ratio, pred
ictive relations for capacitance as a functional of liquid film thickn
ess have been derived for stratified and annular film patterns. The an
alysis eliminates the need for calibrating the sensor for stratified a
nd annular flow regimes. Optical measurements of liquid film thickness
using a high resolution CCD camera are compared against those using t
he capacitance sensor in conjunction with the predictive relations. Th
e sensor was rested on a bench top for a stratified film pattern with
Ilo flow and two different electrode configurations (upward and side c
onfigurations) using FC-87, a low-permittivity (epsilon(r) = 1.72) die
lectric fluid. The standard deviations between the film thicknesses me
asured optically and those predicted using the capacitance sensor and
analysis are 0.014 and 0.019 mm for the respective upward and side ele
ctrode configurations The sensor was also implemented in a vertical fl
ow boiling facility, which uses FC-72 (epsilon(r) = 1.75) as the worki
ng fluid. Time-averaged film thicknesses measured using the capacitanc
e sensor are compared against ensemble-averaged measurements using the
CCD camera for annular vertical upflow and downflow. The upflow and d
ownflow standard deviations are 0.17 and 0.093 mm, respectively. As ex
pected, the agreement for vertical flow is not as good as that for the
horizontal no-flow case, because large fluctuations in film thickness
are characteristic of annular two-phase flow, and the uncertainty of
the photographic measurement is increased.