J. De Champlain et al., Different effects of nifedipine and amlodipine on circulating catecholamine levels in essential hypertensive patients (vol 16, pg 1357, 1998), J HYPERTENS, 16(11), 1998, pp. 1705
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective To compare the acute and chronic effects of nifedipine retard (NP
A), nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (NGITS) and amlodipine a
t trough and peak plasma concentrations of drug on blood pressure and heart
rate, and on plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine levels in patients with
mild-to-moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95-115 mmHg).
Design and methods After 3-4 weeks' placebo treatment, patients of both sex
es were randomly allocated to be administered 10 or 20 mg NPA twice a day,
30 or 60 mg NGITS once a day, and 5 or 10 mg amlodipine once a day for 6 we
eks. Initially, for the first 2 weeks, the lowest dose of each drug was use
d, but higher doses were administered after 2 weeks if sitting diastolic bl
ood pressure was > 90 mmHg, Patients were evaluated after administration of
the first dose and after 6 weeks' therapy in a hospital setting. Blood sam
ples were taken for high-performance liquid chromatography measurement of c
atecholamine and drug levels at various intervals for a period covering tro
ugh to peak drug level ranges.
Results Administration of all three drugs reduced clinic blood pressure to
the same level after 6 weeks' therapy, but heart rate was increased slightl
y only with amlodipine (P< 0.05), Administration of NPA reduced blood press
ure more abruptly whereas administrations of NGITS and amlodipine induced s
moother falls after acute and chronic treatments: a significant increase in
heart rate was observed with amlodipine after chronic treatment. Both acut
e and chronic treatments with NPA (n =19) increased norepinephrine levels (
P < 0.01) transiently (2-4 h). In contrast, administration of NGITS (n = 22
) did not increase norepinephrine levels and even induced a slight but sign
ificant decrease in norepinephrine levels 5-6 h after chronic treatments. A
lthough administration of amlodipine (n = 22) did not increase norepinephri
ne levels transiently either after acute or after chronic administration, i
t did induce a sustained rise in basal norepinephrine levels by more than 5
0% after chronic therapy (P < 0.01). Plasma epinephrine levels were not inc
reased by any of the treatments and even a slight decrease was observed 4 h
after administration of a dose following chronic treatments with NGITS and
amlodipine (P < 0.05).
Conclusions The transient increase in norepinephrine levels observed with N
PA and the sustained increases in norepinephrine levels observed after chro
nic treatment with amlodipine suggest that sympathetic activation occurs wi
th those two drugs. The lack of increase in norepinephrine levels after adm
inistration of NGITS suggests that this formulation does not activate the s
ympathetic system. The lowering of epinephrine levels after administrations
of NGITS and amlodipine suggests that inhibition of release of epinephrine
by the adrenal medulla occurs with longer-acting dihydropyridine formulati
ons, J Hypertens 16:1357-1369 (C) 1998 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.