The French translations of the NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI (Rolland gr Petot, 1994
) were examined to assess their equivalence to the original English-languag
e instruments. Two French samples were employed: college students (N = 447)
responding anonymously and military recruits (N = 268) responding as part
of their military selection process. Internal reliability of domains on bot
h instruments were highly similar to the U.S, normative group, although som
e NEO-PI-R facets were not. Factor structures of the NEO-PI-R at the facet
level and the NEO-FFI at the item level yielded high congruence coefficient
s when target rotated to previously published factor structures from U.S.,
Canadian, and German samples. Recently developed validity scales (Schinka,
Kinder, & Kremer, 1997) were effective at differentiating the self-enhancin
g response set of the military recruits. Concerns that a positive presentat
ion response set yields a 6-factor rather than a 5-factor solution were not
supported by these French samples.