Cd. Lytle et al., Evaluation of three methodologies for testing disposable ENT endoscope sheaths as viral barriers, J TEST EVAL, 26(6), 1998, pp. 587-593
Three methods to determine the barrier function of ENT endoscope sheaths we
re evaluated: (1) the air deflation test, a candidate quality assurance tes
t, compared differences in pressure between a test sheath and an intact one
; (2) a virus barrier test challenged with bacteriophage phi X174 outside t
he sheath, with barrier penetration determined by rinsing inside and assayi
ng for penetrated virus; (3) another virus barrier test challenged from ins
ide, with virus penetration determined by assaying a collection/submersion
solution. Sheaths with laser-drilled holes or tears generated by acupunctur
e needles were tested. Five-mu m holes and larger were detected by air defl
ation or inside virus challenge. Outside virus challenge could reliably det
ect only 30-mu m holes. Tears of 35-mu m length were detected by inside vir
us challenge, while all three tests detected 85-mu m tears. In addition, ai
r bubbles during submersion detected and located 5-mu m holes and larger, s
uggesting another quality assurance test.