Jh. Devries et al., CT BEFORE AND AFTER ERCP - DETECTION OF PANCREATIC PSEUDOTUMOR, ASYMPTOMATIC RETROPERITONEAL PERFORATION, AND DUODENAL DIVERTICULUM, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 45(3), 1997, pp. 231-235
Background: A prospective study was done to investigate the occurrence
of morphologic changes after ERCP that present as pancreatic pseudotu
mor on CT scan. Fifty-eight patients underwent CT before and after ERC
P. In addition, post-ERCP complications and the value of routinely obt
ained CT before ERCP were assessed. Results: Thirty-nine patients coul
d be fully analyzed; 12 underwent a papillotomy (group 1). Pseudotumor
of the pancreatic head was demonstrated on CT after ERCP in 2 of them
(17%). No changes were seen in the 27 patients who underwent diagnost
ic ERCP (group 2) (p = 0.048). Asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforatio
n after papillotomy was diagnosed in 3 patients (13%). Routinely obtai
ned CT scans before ERCP defined a specific etiology of the biliary ob
struction in 12% of patients not suggested by ultrasound. Duodenal div
erticulum was found in 4 patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 36% a
nd a specificity of 100% for CT. Oral contrast (600 ml) administered a
few hours before endoscopy never hampered the endoscopist. Conclusion
: Pancreatic pseudotumor on CT after ERCP occurred only when papilloto
my was performed. CT remains a valuable diagnostic tool after diagnost
ic ERCP. Asymptomatic perforation may occur following ERCP with papill
otomy. Routinely obtained CT before ERCP was not profitable for the en
doscopist in more than 80% of our patients.